Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

What I meant to say was ...

  • Feb. 20th, 2006 at 10:22 PM
A Book of Endings
What I meant to say was, it doesn't matter.

No, wait, that's not what I meant to say.

[info]zarabee: I tested it out last month. I said to deborahb "I'm not sure I'm a writer, anymore". She said the sort of thing that only Deb can, and I didn't feel any pain, or regret, or angst. Just ... Yeah.

What I meant to say was, it only matters if it's important to you. Wait, does that sound harsh? Does that sound like I'm abandoning you to your fate?

What I meant to say was, it's important to me if it's important to you, except that sounds hokey, & is not at all what I meant to say.

I meant to say: you're right. You're on a good track. You're in a good place, but you're probably not, or maybe it might not seem that way to you, & anyway, is it patronising of me to say that?

You said something like
"Is that working for you? ... Good for you, Baxter!"


Oh, good, that explains it.

Because what I meant to say was, 'If that's working for you, good. If that's what it takes, stick with it. You do whatever it is you have to do.' That's what I meant to say.

Because some of the worst people I know call themselves writers, & it doesn't make a stick of difference to how boring/nuts/deluded/self-righteous/smug/antagonistic they are. And it doesn't make a stick of difference to their writing.

And some of the best writers I know have struggled with writing. They've also struggled with those idiot-rules, like 'write every day' and 'write a thousand words a day' and 'you have to write novels if you're a serious writer' and you know what?

If any of those processes work for you, hold onto 'em. If writing a thousand words a day, every day, works, do it & don't think about it. But if it doesn't work, run. Run from that & from anything else that has 'have to' in its beginning/middle/end.

And some of the best writers I know have struggled not just with writing, not just with rules, but with 'being a writer'. Being. A. Writer. The only time I've ever spent not-writing & losing-faith have been when I've tried to Be. A. Writer. All my energy & angst went into trying to work out how to Be. A. Writer. I looked around at all the models of writers I saw & knew, & I didn't recognise myself in any of them. I was new & green & worried. I was not writing a thousand words a day, nor was I turning out a gem each two years that was being lauded by WFA judges or Hugo boards or anything like it. I counted up my published stories & there weren't that many (I think it was 'one') & I didn't feel any better than I had when I'd had no stories published & I knew then that the whole 'published writer' gig hadn't changed the world, not even my world, not even my mood for more than a week. I wanted the label to work so I didn't have to look at myself. But someone said to me, 'What would you be if you weren't a writer.'

I said, 'I guess I'd just be human', kinda spat it out. Sneered, if I remember right. Hated the idea. Just human, just like everybody else. Just the biggest challenge I've ever faced, being human, trying to understand what 'everybody else' was really like. Trying to fake it. Faking writing is easier than faking human, & I've tried both. Maybe I'm still faking. It doesn't matter to what I'm trying to do, so I don't think about it much. I'm too busy with the 'doing'.

So I chucked in the towel. I gave up. I stopped being a writer. Who cared? At the end of it all I would still be human, with it's big fat 'so what' sticker stuck across its big fat face. So freaking what.

I wrote, then, because I was no longer anything more than human & I had a lot I wanted to say about that. I wrote because I no longer had anything to prove. It was all over for me. What a goddamn relief. The energy I'd accidentally surrendered to my struggle with Being. A. Writer. found a new channel. Living. Also, writing. Funny that. Whatever works, that's what I meant to say. Whatever works. So, maybe (and this isn't a prescription, just a suggestion) ask yourself, 'If I'm not a writer, what am I?' Maybe you'll hate the answer, too, maybe not. Hell, it's your journey. It's not the answer so much as how you come to terms with it. It's the process that's important. It's all in the process.

Which brings me to the place I'm in, for what it's worth, & you can ignore this or not. It's up to you, & what's important to me is that you find your own path & your own struggles & your own meaning. 'Cos *that's* the stuff that's gonna make your writing worthwhile, whether you end up Being. A. Writer. or not. 'Cos *that's* the stuff that's gonna make you a worthwhile human being, despite the fact worthiness or worthfulness or whatever-you-want will not *necessarily* make your writing better (though it just might). I am still childish and wrathful enough that I wish good people made good writers and good writers were always good people, but it ain't that simple & I'll make my peace with that one day. In the meantime, if your writing can come out of who you are & who you're trying to be as a human being, then you're on the same path as me. And if that path works for you, then hold to it hard for as long as it works. But if it doesn't work, or it stops working, then you know what you have to do.

Run.

Comments

[info]speshal_k wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 11:39 am (UTC)
*lovely*!
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 11:48 am (UTC)
*sweet* :)
[info]bodhichitta0 wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 01:29 pm (UTC)
"'Cos *that's* the stuff that's gonna make you a worthwhile human being, despite the fact worthiness or worthfulness or whatever-you-want will not *necessarily* make your writing better (though it just might)."

You rocked my socks right off. :-D *joins the deborahb fan club*
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 02:05 am (UTC)
Ha! Welcome. ;) Bring beer.
[info]hollowpoint wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 03:48 pm (UTC)
I didn't know how much I needed to read that until I did. :/
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 02:05 am (UTC)
Glad to oblige. (If that is, indeed, what I did...)
[info]hollowpoint wrote:
Feb. 26th, 2006 12:30 am (UTC)
Indeed it was. Thank you!
[info]strangedave wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 05:11 pm (UTC)
There seems to be so much more to being a Writer than just being someone who writes. You have to not just write, but fulfill some sort of mythic archetype of the struggling genius. Just being someone who writes stuff when they want to sounds a lot easier.
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 02:07 am (UTC)
Yeah, that bunk about suffering for your art doesn't wash with me anymore. Write cos you enjoy it. If you don't enjoy it, do something else. Life is so darn short.
[info]benpayne wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 08:34 pm (UTC)
I still think that the best people make the best writers... although I'm aware this may be wrong, it's a belief i cling to for no reason other than that I like it... which is not to say that the best people make the most popular or successful writers...

My usual response to people who say "I'm not a writer anymore" or such things is to tell them "Yes you are. You'll always be a writer, whether you want to or not. I don't care what *you* think you are."

They love that:)

Personally, I understand the railing expectation thing. I don't understand the big emphasis that gets put on the label. It's just words, man, you put them on and take them off like hats if you want to... today I'm a writer, and I don't write, tomorrow I'm a tea-cosy who can't keep the tea warm... I can think of myself in any terms I want and there's no pressure... the worst that can happen is that I'm wrong... big deal.

And whether other people think of me as a writer or not is irrelevent. I'll write just as much (or as little) if people think I'm a writer as I will if they think I'm a blackboard duster. It's water off a duster's back. Or something.

I'm not saying anyone else is wrong or that I'm right (although I AM INCONTRAVERTIBLY RIGHT ALWAYS).... it's all cool and you do what works for you... but for me labels are like... "meh"...

[info]llbatt wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 12:58 am (UTC)
"I still think that the best people make the best writers... "

Well that's me</i> fucked, then, isn't it? :)

In all seriousness, I'm not convinced of the truth: Mozart was a shit, Rembrandt was a shit, Einstein was a shit, Kubrick was a shit, Bill Hicks was a shit... I think the urge to create, for the 'best' of any field, is often at the very uppermost of all thoughts. In some cases, that can lead them to relegating absolutely everything else to 2nd place at best. I won't deny that there are some absolutely beautiful people creating great art, and those are the artists you want to be around and (hopefully) to be.

But I've always held the belief that I have to become a great artist to be forgiven for being a shit, otherwise I'll just be remembered for being a shit :)
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 02:09 am (UTC)
>But I've always held the belief that I have to become a great artist to be forgiven for being a shit, otherwise I'll just be remembered for being a shit :)<

'Course you run the risk of being remembered as 'great writer, shit human being'. ;))

And I hate that kind of person just as much.

Tee hee!
[info]llbatt wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 04:30 am (UTC)
Yeah, but nobody says "Mozart? Great music, pity he was a shit." :)
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 08:12 am (UTC)
I often say that about Picasso, however. 'Great painter, fucked up human being.'

Memories are long... :)
[info]benpayne wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 09:08 am (UTC)
I'm sure it's probably a crap theory, but that's never stopped me before:)

Lookit this way; to be the best writer (for me) a person needs to be intelligent, able to empathise with different people like and unlike themself, imaginative, not take themself too seriously, and have good politics. Those may not translate to real life (tm) of course, but it's a good head-start.

Or maybe all artists are narcissistic pricks. I know I am.

[info]llbatt wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 11:13 am (UTC)
Well I make it two from two. Anyone brave enough to put their hand up and say they aren't, so Ben and I can mock you? :)
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 11:45 am (UTC)
Oh, definite narcissist here.
[info]stephen_dedman wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 12:53 pm (UTC)
Yeah, me too.

Eric Blair (George Orwell) once said that he realized one day that the reason he wrote was he couldn't resist showing people how clever he was (that's not an exact quote, but it's as close as memory allows), and I think that's true of most of us. Probably all.
[info]buymeaclue wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 01:52 pm (UTC)
I'm not sure I'd be willing to commit to 'the best people make the best writers'...but I've felt for a while now that if you're paying attention and making an honest effort, writing will make you into a better person for reasons like the ones you mention.

Of course, I think that's probably true of many things, and 'paying attention and making an honest effort' may assume too much. But...most things will try, I think.
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 02:12 am (UTC)
>I still think that the best people make the best writers<

I still *wish* the best people made the best writers ...

:)
[info]i_ate_my_crusts wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 08:42 pm (UTC)
I'm feeling much better today - and this was perfect. Yes, to all of that. Yes.
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 02:10 am (UTC)
:) Whew.
[info]nydeborah wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 09:20 pm (UTC)
I don't think I've ever heard it better said.
That's great Deborah, and inspiring to me personally. Thank you.
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 02:10 am (UTC)
Re: I don't think I've ever heard it better said.
Total coolness. :)
[info]chocolatetrudi wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 12:35 am (UTC)
So true...
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 02:11 am (UTC)
'Least in my opinion it is. ;)
[info]slobbit wrote:
Feb. 21st, 2006 02:30 pm (UTC)
here via [info]buymeaclue

Awesome. Simply awesome. Thanks.
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 22nd, 2006 02:22 am (UTC)
Hey, coolness. :)
[info]chidder wrote:
Feb. 22nd, 2006 12:25 am (UTC)
Why We Write
Rather than post my comments here, I did so on my own blog, thus contributing some column inches to my own otherwise sparse space on the Internet. Blame it on shameless self-promotion.
[info]deborahb wrote:
Feb. 22nd, 2006 02:23 am (UTC)
Re: Why We Write
Excellent. I shall go read. :)


Bookmark and Share


counter

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Keri Maijala